![]() It has some structural problems, too one gets the impression that he didn’t know from one chapter to the next what would happen his attempts at probing the deep significance of the conflict between MacIan and Turnbull through their dreams are failures. His judgement is basically sound: little effort is made to disguise the fact that the minor characters exist only as an occasion to critique one worldview or another. ![]() It is not one of Chesterton’s best books he himself claimed later in life that he did not like it, even penning a little verse on the subject: ![]() In the end the two find that, despite their differences, they can indeed fight side by side, for they share one conviction not shared by the others: devotion to truth. The characters who wander between them roughly represent different philosophies and views of life, and so the book is a sequence of scenes in which the Catholic and the atheist argue with a wide spectrum of opponents, all the while wanting only to fight one another. ![]() But each time they find a quiet place to conduct their business, they are interrupted at the last moment. In this, one of his earliest novels, Chesterton tells the story of two Scotsmen, MacIan and Turnbull, the former a Catholic and the latter an atheist, trying to settle their differences not through argument but rather by that time-honoured tradition: the duel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |